I’ve written a lot of stories about the refugees from Southern Sudan since they started coming to Israel five years ago. Most of the articles were critical of the way the government treated them, and sought to gain sympathy for these people who saw their families killed and villages burned, who faced overt racism in Egypt and risked their lives to cross the Sinai and get to Israel.
But I also made it clear that however grudging or ungenerous the state’s reception of these people had been, Israel had treated them a hundred times better than Egypt had, and a trillion times better than Sudan had. The Southern Sudanese refugees, who are mainly Christians, escaped two Arab countries to get to the Jewish state. However tough a time the government has given them, their main concern has been that they won’t be allowed to stay, and their second concern has been that more of their countrymen won’t be allowed in to join them.
Unlike Egypt and Sudan, Israel didn’t kill these people, didn’t enslave them, didn’t use any sort of violence against them. This is not by any means to say, though, that Israel took them in with open arms - for the first year of the migration, they were kept in jail, and since their numbers grew from the hundreds to the thousands, they’ve been made to feel distinctly unwelcome by the authorities and the poor people living in the neighborhoods they’ve moved into. But still in all, most of them are working, and they’ve received tremendous help from a range of Israeli NGOs, while the Tel Aviv Municipality, where most of them live, has treated them with humanity.
Southern Sudan, which officially became independent on Saturday, is a black African country that has traumatic memories of oppression at the hands of Arabs, and relatively good experiences with Israel. As oppressed Christians, they identify with the Jews of the Bible. Their country wants good relations with Israel, and vice versa, and the odds are it’s going to happen.
“[W]e would be happy to cooperate with it in order to ensure its development and prosperity,” Netanyahu said Sunday, announcing Israel’s recognition of the new state. Even if the two countries’ relationship is based on mutual self-interest – Israel sees Southern Sudan as a wedge in the hostile Muslim and Third World, while Southern Sudan sees Israel as a donor state and provider of entree to America – it’s enlightened mutual self-interest. The cause of Southern Sudan is a great one, and Israel has certainly been more of a friend than an enemy to it, especially in relation to the performance of the Arab world. If it’s fair to remind Israel of its complicity in apartheid, it’s fair to remind the Arabs about their complicity in Sudan’s murderous, medieval oppression of its black Christians.
More than one refugee told me that the only soldiers who’d ever treated them well, who’d made them feel safe instead of in danger, were Israeli soldiers. So congratulations, Southern Sudan, and here’s to the beginning of a historic friendship.

Interesting and good, and good for you for your sustained attention to their plight over the years. What is to be the fate of these people who had the good fortune to be taken in by Israel and rescued from an evil situation? I mean to what dispositions and dispensations are they likely to go from here?
If there’s security in S. Sudan, back home, if not, they’ll stay here indefinitely.
It’s about damn time they got their independence. Let’s hope they can keep it, and prevent the depredations the North inflicted upon them for decades at a time in the face of a apathetic international community.
‘Yet’, ‘never’,’ maybe,’ ‘sometime in the next 20 – 40 years as an optimistic estimate’.
Do we really have that long to contemplate the problem?
I, for one, should be very surprised if another cataclysmic event does not happen before this year is out.
And our answer then will be what?
Please give us one or two more generations to come up with a suitable response to the situation. That’s sure to go down well with most people in the region, especially the young.
There just isn’t that amount of time left. What is needed is a comprehensive, all-encompassing structure, firmly locked into place, transparent and permanent with enough certainty of purpose for everyone concerned to embrace with open arms.
Perhaps ‘open arms’ is a trifle too ambitious in this context but the principle of universal agreement on how to proceed is one well worth pursuing. And implementing.
We do seem to live in an imperfect world. But there are times when those same imperfections can be channeled in all the right directions.
If we are to seek perfection in this matter, then let it come to us rather than we to it.
It works so out much easier that way
Oops! The above comment was on the wrong thread. It should have been a response to the latest entry from Dimi.
But it does rather reinforce the belief that this is an imperfect world, we ourselves being the chief contributor to that condition.